
I've been thinking about what to do with my online 'Tumperkin' name.
When I adopted that moniker, about 4-5 years ago now, it was on a whim. I wanted to comment on the first reader blog I'd started regularly visiting (Bam's place) and I wanted that comment to be something other than anon. I wanted to own the comment, and not just for the duration of the thread. I hadn't yet started seriously trying to write and I had no real idea about the online world. The name was plucked out of the air - a silly pet name Mr T used to use. I started my own blog a few months later and so my investment in this absurd name increased.
I blogged, I wrote. Eventually I submitted my manuscript. And suddenly, here I am, due to become a published author under the name Joanna Chambers - at the end of this year.
I'm setting up an author website - I only have bare bones of that just now - but I also want to maintain a blog, and for that blog to still have a readerly slant. I've decided therefore, to 'migrate' my current online identity to my author name. Eventually, I'll probably move the blog over to the author website too, when it's ready, but for now I'll keep running IIR and may retain it as an archive of all my old posts (unless I can work out how to migrate the content).
I'm thinking of doing this in phases over the next few months:-
1. Change gravatar to new one (done - here and on Twitter)
2. Change identity to 'Joanna Chambers (nee Tumperkin)' (ok, I know it's a little 'artist formerly known as Prince' but still...)
3. Change identity to 'Joanna Chambers'
4. Once website ready, migrate blogging activity over
What do you think? Sensible?
That's the easy part. The more difficult part is thinking about whether to change anything I actually do blogging-wise. I love talking about my readerly thoughts but once I'm 'out' as an author will I feel differently about that? I know this topic has been spoken about a lot recently (Jill Sorenson's honest and considered post at Dear Author, Sunita's plea for more peer review at Vacuous Minx) My personal worry is that there would be a perceived difference between reader-me saying X and author-me saying X, i.e. if reader-me says this book lacked pace, I'm not suggesting I could do better. But if author-me says it, the worry is that there's an implicit, I am the Oracle of the paciness of books - check out my work if you want to see how it's done.
God, the thought.
As it happens, I don't tend to write 'proper' reviews - I tend to want to blog about quite specific things - things that capture my imagination and actually it tends to be things that provoke predominantly (though not exclusively) positive reactions in me. So maybe it will be easier than I think.
Then there's the whole promotion thing which, clearly, I'll have to do. But this blog has always been promotion free and of course, being me, I've been all self-congratulatory about that like a gigantic idiot. Bah. Actually, maybe I should keep my readerly blog here? Or, not. Oh, it's tricky! I suppose I'm just going to have to find my way as best I can.
I should say I think there are people who do this (writer reviewing/talking about books) really well and with integrity e.g. Jill Sorenson at DA, Lynne Connelly at TGTBTU to name but two. But suddenly, it's me in this situation.
What do you think, both about the migration plan and this?



