Saturday, July 31, 2010

The End, part 1


I mentioned that my holiday reading had got me thinking about endings. There are two broad trains of thought I had about this. This is the first and it relates to how well the ending satisfies and why.

Endings are important to any story, but most especially to the romance novel which (received wisdom has it) must deliver a HEA. Whilst the ingredients for a perfect HEA may vary from reader, for me, much is to do with the measure of it.

Proportion is important. If, for example, the hero has acted badly, he needs to counteract that behaviour. The size of the apology should fit the offence. This was a notion that Judith Ivory played with rather nicely in The Indiscretion (one of my holiday reads).

Spoilers ahead.

Close to the end of The Indiscretion, the hero, Sam, loses his temper with the heroine, Lydia. She has been publicly behaving badly towards him and he declaims her for it, calling her a snob and a shrew - in which accusations there is some truth. Lydia is humiliated, distraught and angry even whilst she recognises that she pushed him into this to some extent. Sam feels bad. He knows himself to be a difficult, obstinate man at times, one who often gives offence and who is sometimes unlikeable. He doesn't like that part of himself especially. But his apology to Lydia isn't right:

"I make mistakes. Sometimes they're painful ones. I told you, I'm sorry."

She blinked at him.
I'm sorry? These two words were supposed to fix her hurt? Perhaps she was being petty, but they didn't. They weren't large enough; they didn't feel commensurate to the offence.

At the very end of the book, however, Sam goes to watch Lydia compete at an archery meet. She wins the meet but an old beau of Lydia's makes sneering remarks about women not being able to shoot as well as men. Sam rises to her defence and with all his usual thrawnness, challenges the man to extravagant wager to make his point - the beau's new crested carriage against £500 if Lydia can shoot a cigarette from Sam's mouth to the target, Annie Oakley-style:

Sam was still, utterly rigid, except for the wince as the feathers of the arrow literally kissed his mouth on their way past, the end of the cigarette exploding into shreds of tobacco. Bits of it flew at his face. He was left with a half inch of frayed cigarette clamped in his teeth for dear life.... He took the wet piece out then, smiling, filliped it up into an arc, showing Liddy what remained. People were already cheering as he ran towards her.

An extravagant apology; no words. Or maybe not an apology, but something better. A public declaration of the right sort this time.

Pacing too, is absolutely crucial. I am actually quite fond of the much-maligned epilogue, particularly in a novel in which there has been a lot of fast-paced action leading up to the natural conclusion. In event-heavy conclusions, the romance can sometimes get back-burnered. A well-written epilogue can settle me in to the sense of HEA nicely. It depends entirely upon the pacing and structure of the rest of the novel of course. If there has been little conflict between the H/H and the declarations have already been firmly made, accepted and settled by the end anyway, an epilogue can feel pointless, flabby, even sickly, like too much cake.

For me, the declaration scene(s) are key to the pacing. Some novels will have a mutual declaration scene. Others will have a one protagonist declare first with the other coming later. It's a bit like a contract. You need both offer and acceptance to make it good. My personal hate is when the declaration happens only at the very end, rushed into the last paragraph or two. Not that late declarations never work, if the groundwork has been well laid, but ideally I like this stretched out a bit.

Black Ice suffered from this rushed-ness a bit for me. The final declarations were crammed into the last page or so and I closed the novel craving more from the final scene, even as I recognised that it was arguably appropriate to the overall pacing and Bastien's character arc. In fairness, there was an earlier sort-of declaration scene (Bastien tells Chloe he loves her but she doesn't believe him) which helped set up the final declaration and made it's brevity more palatable than it might otherwise have been, but even then, I would have liked just five minutes - or two even! - alone with Bastien and Chloe to experience their happiness and relief before they left me. I felt a little robbed not to get that.

My next post will look at final sentences and the feelings they leave us with.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

My developing thoughts on romantic suspense


As mentioned in my last post, I read a couple of romantic suspense novels over my holiday and really enjoyed them - Black Ice by Anne Stuart and Skin Game by Ava Gray. This is notable really only because of my long resistance to romantic suspense.

Why the resistance? Well, I've tended to find it difficult to get on board with heroes (and heroines) who kill indiscriminately. And romantic suspense tends to have a higher quotient of violence as well as a brand of hero who is familiar with - and not bothered by - violence and death. Generally, that's not my cuppa. The main problem it gives me is a credibility one. I associate lack of reaction to violence with an inability to feel emotion/ empathise with others. How can a man who can commit violence and kill so easily, develop the sort of love I want him to feel for the heroine? I particularly hate when the hero's attachment to the heroine comes across as a stalkerish obsession rather than falling in love - that just makes me worry about the heroine.

The heroes in Black Ice and Skin Game fit the mould of the hero I'm not keen on. In BI, Bastien is a secret agent with a death wish. In SG, Rey is a for-hire assassin. Both have killed frequently and without much apparent difficulty. So, how did I manage to enjoy these books?

It's two things really. The first is that I think I found the brain-switch that I needed to flick to read romantic suspense. (I seem to recall a similar moment with paranormals. One minute, they were all basically Transformers and the next, I was on board. I'd just made the requisite mental adjustment). The second - and possibly related - thing is that both BI and SG share a less-than-realistic setting. I think it's that lack of realism that (paradoxically?) helps me suspend my disbelief (and perhaps my reader beliefs).

BI has a secret-agenty setting with covert organisations plotting complicated events. To me, that's fantasy. In SG's case, there's a sci-fi element too (the heroine has the power to steal others' skills) that takes the reader into a different realm altogether. In short, this stepping away from reality alleviates my anxieties about the hero's violent tendancies. I can more readily accept him as a fantasy-character and accept that he is capable of loving the heroine.

I discovered something else as I read these two books: the appeal, I suppose, of certain romantic suspense heroes. The dead-to-emotion-cold-killer hero is a direct cousin of the Regency rake. Ok, one kills and maims while the other sleeps with whores and drinks contraband brandy. But it's the same classic Beauty & the Beast story, only the hero has a beastly soul rather than a beastly body. Pierce the ugly surface (as the heroine inevitably does) and inside there is something to be redeemed and worthy of being loved. Classic romance.

To the primary romance reader (like me) a suspense plot is part of the setting more than a real plot. I didn't read BI in order to find out if Bastien could save Chloe from the Committee (the suspense plot). I read it to find out if Chloe could save Bastien from himself (the romance). The suspense was interesting to me, though, in terms of its potential to advance/boost/ the romance conflict through external danger/events, though that sort of external conflict is less satisfying to me as a reader than internal conflict. Which is another reason I liked BI and SG - they both had internal conflict as well as external.

What about you? If you like suspense plots, what is the draw? If you don't what turns you off?

Friday, July 23, 2010

Back from holiday with readerly observations aplenty which serves to remind me why I blog as well as providing fodder for blog posts to come

I have returned from a smashing holiday. We had a week in London; another in the country (Gloucestershire and Herefordshire). It was lovely: relaxing and fun and family oriented. We went to lots of very interesting places in London and canoed and cycled and walked in the country, as well as going swimming most days which the children love. This meant I spent a lot of time in a 60cm kiddy pool with my younger one playing a game about sharks and boathooks (inspired by Mrs Armitage and the Big Wave) a game of which he never tired.

I occasionally go to London for work and it's a huge and enormous drag each time I do. I was therefore not hugely predisposed to enjoy it. But I had a fantastic time! My favourite day was Hampton Court (below) which has such a lot of very interesting things under its roof. Lots of original and very famous art. Much of Hampton Court is dedicated to Henry VIII but my personal favourite part was the Georgian apartments. It's very child-friendly and unstuffy too with good interactive things to do and lots of outdoor space including a maze. The gardens are beautiful.



We also went to Greenwich which was lovely. The Royal Naval College there has been turned into a music school so we were wandering through the square with the sound of singing and piano and clarinets drifting out of the rooms around us.

We managed to drag the children round two museums: the Natural History Museum (Mr T's choice) and the V&A (my choice and the clear winner). The children were pretty good but Mr T and I want to go back sans enfants to spend more time going round the Japanese art and fashion sections of the V&A. See above a genuine 'half-boot' from the early 19th century that I marvelled over till dragged away by one of the children. It looks unremarkable in the photo but when you see the real thing, it's a marvel of beauty and detail and the ankle it fitted must have been very very dainty!

Above is the river Wye, upon which I can now say I have rowed. Mr T would refute that. He says he did all the work, therefore I merely floated, while he rowed. This is unfair as I was trying. I am just not the sporty type and he knew that before he married me. I told him I would never change.

Reading-wise, I was true to my intentions, completing Black Ice by Anne Stuart, Skin Game by Ava Gray and The Forbidden Rose by Joanna Bourne. I also read Love's a Stage by Laura London (aka Tom and Sharon Curtis) which has been a previous DNF for me and am almost finished The Indiscretion by Judith Ivory.

What a haul!

I have things to say about Black Ice and Skin Game, certainly, most particularly the fact that I enjoyed both despite my previously stated lack of enthusiasm for romantic suspense and active dislike of heroes who kill without compunction (and the heroes of both these books fall squarely into that category). So some thoughts on that will be my next post.

Black Ice and Skin Game also made me ponder endings again. For different reasons as it happens. Skin Game made me think about the rhythm of the ending and the feelings it leaves the reader with vis-a-vis the HEA. Black Ice made me think about the pace of the resolution and how satisfying the HEA ultimately feels (you may think these two sentences sound like they're talking about the same thing but trust me - it's two very separate things).

I'm enjoying The Indiscretion enormously at the moment. It's reminding me of an exchange I had with Victoria Janssen on her blog about lengthy descriptions of protagonists in romance novels. In short, I'm very much for them (if done right, and I count Ivory as being Top Banana at that) because in my experience, when you fall in love, you look and look and look and feel delight in the other person's physical person. Consequently, a written narrative of precisely that thing gives the feel of falling in love (to me). I'm not sure I'll say more on The Indiscretion than that it does that thing I've just described beautifully.

I will say this about The Forbidden Rose. I loved it. I really adore Joanna Bourne's books, I do. They make me feel (and I mean this in the very nicest way) like giving up attempting to write myself because if I cannot write precisely and EXACTLY a Joanna Bourne book, I don't really see the point (at least not while I'm engaged in reading one). Reading one of her books is envy and admiration all at once. It feels like love but also like snakes writhing in my stomach.

And finally, Love's A Stage? I'm afraid it was slight and dated. If you want to read Tom and Sharon Curtis, I recommend instead Sunshine and Shadows.

Finally, this is the soundtrack of my holiday.




I hope you've all had a lovely fortnight. I'm afraid I marked the 300+ items in my Google reader as read so have probably missed out on a plethora of very exciting and interesting posts...

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Have been reading, will be reading, am reading


This is what I'm reading at the moment - and I'm really enjoying it! This surprises me, because the characters are kinda..... bad. The hero is a killer and the heroine runs cons.

Actually, I'm loving it. Loving the taut prose especially.

Also, yesterday, I bought an ebook (which I never do but I couldn't resist - this was a Spice brief by Megan Hart and only one pound fifty!). Menage novella. Everything Changes. I really liked that too. Well-realised voice for the solely male narrator. No HEA. Not what I associate with Harlequin/ Mills and Boon.

I've been saving up some treats for my holiday. Sadly Lady Isabella's Scandalous Marriage hasn't arrived yet but I do have Joanna Bourne's Forbidden Rose. Also, I've been saving up The Indiscretion by Judith Ivory for a while and I also have Black Ice by Anne Stuart recommended by various people. So much to enjoy.

Have a good couple of weeks.

T

Friday, July 9, 2010

Friday music: in praise of Northumbria


What a great little county Northumbria is. It's got the best beaches (Embleton, pictured above), fab pubs, Bamburgh Castle, Alnwick Gardens, the Holy Isle. We go there a fair bit. It's a good half way meeting point with my Yorkshire in-laws.

Charming accent too. Put to good effect by The Unthanks in this lovely haunting folk song, Here's the Tender Coming, about press gangs coming to South Shields.



Friday, July 2, 2010

Sorry to bore on about this again....


... but this post has been brewing for a while. So let me lay it on the line, and no dressing it up this time.

WHEREAS

(First) I blow a wee bit hot and cold with my blogging life;
(Second) I blog primarily to connect with others and exchange ideas;
(Third) Comments on this blog are, sadly, decreasing;
(Fourth) This blog feels to me like a conversation that is gradually running out; and
(Fifth) Nevertheless, I don't want to give up blogging

AND NOTWITHSTANDING

(First) My oft-repeated view that my favourite blogs have a distinct voice; and
(Second) My concerns over sharing

NOW I AM WONDERING

What the solution is? Group blogging? Guest blogging? Any suggestions most welcome. (Note: this is not a plea for reassurance. It actually is this question I am asking.)