
I've already waxed lyrical about Sarah Mayberry. For my money, she's the best writer of contemporary romance I've ever read, bar none. The cornerstones of her strong satisfying stories are believable characters and relateable conflict. Part of me wishes she'd write something longer than her standard categories just so I could get more in one reading but then I'd have to wait longer between books and that would be awful. So, as long as she keeps writing, I'll be happy.
Initially, I thought Her Best Friend was going to disappoint me. I read the first couple of chapters and didn't feel hooked. But then I picked it up again and suddenly I was into it. It was just a slower burner getting started than some of her others.
This is a friends-to-lovers book, a trope I used to hate until I read Anything for You by Mayberry. Why did I hate such a favourite romance plot? On reflection, I think it's because the friends-to-lovers books I'd read before had failed to convince me about the underlying friendship. This is where Mayberry excels. You really believe in the pre-existing relationship and when her characters worry, for example, that if they get together they'll lose that friendship, it feels like a valid concern rather than just, well, made-up-shit.
Her Best Friend has another angle beyond friends-to-lovers though. As well as Amy the heroine and Quinn the hero, we have Lisa - Quinn's soon to be ex-wife and Amy's friend. The three of them had been friends at school with Lisa and Quinn getting together in their mid-teens and eventually marrying. So Amy and Quinn don't just have to develop from friends to lovers, they have to do so in the face of all that history.
When the book opens, Amy has just fulfilled a lifelong ambition by verbally closing a deal on a derelict cinema her grandfather had built and that she wants to restore. However, another developer wants the site and it looks as though the Council is going to welch on the deal. Reluctantly, she decides to call Lisa for advice. She's spent a year and a half avoiding Lisa and Quinn. Having been in love with Quinn for 16 years, she had finally decided that she needed to remove herself from his and Lisa's lives and get on with her own life. However, when she calls, she gets Quinn rather than Lisa. He gives her some advice but doesn't immediately tell her that he and Lisa split a year previously. Instead, he takes some leave and goes to his old home town to help Amy some more with the legal situation, and then with the actual restoration.
When Amy discovers that Quinn and Lisa have split, she feels torn. She's excited at the thought that he is available, a little guilty that she's having those thoughts and bothered that her hard-worn equilibrium is going to be upset again, when she's worked so hard to create distance between them. Overriding all of these reactions, though, are her strong feelings of love and friendship for Quinn. It's the same with Quinn - his primary reaction to Amy is one of caring affection with all the complications and comforts of a longstanding and deep friendship.
Mayberry does a good job of showing how the sexual attraction Quinn is experiencing around Amy feels - not wrong as such - I'm struggling to find the right word here, maybe, exploitative? There's a scene where he walks in on her while she's taking her top off. He pauses to watch for a few seconds before he backs away, undetected. He then spends the next few minutes pondering whether to 'fess up before uncomfortably deciding not to. The thing I liked about that scene was that it showed not only that their existing relationship was based on honesty and trust but also how uncomfortable Quinn felt when that was compromised. A mild little bit of voyeurism (the sort of scene a typical romance hero might well exploit to the full) becomes a neat illustration of how sex really will threaten the cornerstones of their friendship. Amy and Quinn both realise that sex will change everything between them and their carefulness with each other around this felt like believable behaviour in her hands.
I was relieved that Mayberry didn't resort to painting Lisa (who cheated on Quinn) as a villain. Lisa has her faults but she is a fully three dimensional character and someone Amy cares about and likes. However, she is not someone Amy is prepared to sacrifice her happiness over needlessly. While Amy cares about how Lisa will feel about her and Quinn getting together, Lisa's reaction isn't an insurmountable obstacle for Amy. It was refreshing not to have the musty old chestnut of I can't get together with X because of Y, even though their relationship is over. I'm not a fan of black and white thinking in protaganists so I greatly appreciated that this dilemma was not presented as complete obstacle that is then overcome right at the end by some sleight of hand.
And finally a word about likeable heroes.
I love my tortured Regency rakes, I really do. But it is refreshing to see a depiction of a hero who is kind, fair and non superhuman, just a very real, relateable person. Reading Quinn, it occurred to me what an underrated skill it is, to write a likeable character, particularly a romance hero. Arguably, tortured heroes are easier. If you have a hero who's all secretly traumatised and cold and distant, you can get away with having him act unemotionally/ appallingly all the way through the book, creating shedloads of conflict and then sort it all out with a big redeem near the end. How many times have you read that particular cliche? Hundreds in my case (and I love it, I do - I'm not dissing it!) but it's also satisfying seeing a hero be consistent and rational and thoughtful in a way that feels believeable and true. And actually, that's a quality I think I need to see in contemps more than in other genres.
And I know I said that that was my final point but I can't close without mentioning how much I loved the drunken and pillow-biting declaration scene.
If I was going to be picky, I'd have to say that Her Best Friend didn't quite reach the high watermark of Anything For You for me, but it really was a thoroughly likeable read.
Can you think of any memorable likeable heroes I should check out?


8 comments:
I have read several SuperRomances in the last few weeks, partly because I'm busy and they're short. But this post made me see the likeable heroes are part of why I'm seeking them out. I have a hard time with CONTEMPORARY heroines who would put up with very angsty, unemotional, nasty guys. I'm much more willing to suspend disbelief in historicals. It's too bad, from my POV, that in the hero's likeability seems to be demonstrated so often by falling in love with someone carrying another man's baby. I avoid those. I don't mind kids, though, if they act like real kids, so some of these have 'em. (I also find Super Wendy and RRR Jessica a pretty good guide to category authors I will like).
Ellen Hartman: His Secret Past. Mason is angstier than Quinn, but not nearly as annoying as you'd expect from a former rock star/addict. His niceness is a big part of the book. I loved this (though I wished it were longer with a bit more time for the couple together). Also Plan B: Boyfriend by the same author. Hero does try to repress his likeability and emotions, but without much success.
Non-SuperRomance:
Carter from Nora Roberts' Vision in White.
Jessica Hart's Oh-So-Sensible-Secretary. This one is first-person from heroine's POV, and she *thinks* hero will be the cold playboy sort, but it's pretty obvious from the start she's reading him wrong (so it ties into that conversation about unreliable narrators you've been having elsewhere with Robin. Er, hope that doesn't sound like I'm Internet stalking you).
If you try a Dahl contemp, you might find her heroes fit the bill as well.
In historicals, I'd see Nev from Rose Lerner's In for a Penny this way.
All of these have funny moments, which is something I like about Mayberry too and is part of what makes the books likeable for me. Sorry to go on and on. Clearly I have been reading too much lately.
I have this one on my reader but haven't opened it up yet. It is nice to read a story where there's no spies or serial killers and where the problems the h/h have are realistic and you actually like the characters. I've been planning to read a contemporary next so this one might just be it. Thx for reminding me I have it!
This one sounds great - thanks for the rec!
I am a total Beta girl, my favorite heroes tend to be more Beta than Alpha, so their likeability factor is usually pretty high.
I agree with the Dahl recommend. The entire Tumble Creek trilogy has likeable heroes. My fave is Chase from LEAD ME ON. Such a sweetheart!
Brockway's, Harry from AS YOU DESIRE and E. Hoyt's hero (also named Harry) in THE LEOPARD PRINCE are both very likable.
I gush over Mayberry, too. I'm still working my way through her backlist. I really liked how she finessed Lisa's role in the story, while I do believe her infidelity (the affair was 2 years LONG!!) was "explained," I feel that Quinn & Amy treated her with far more respect than her actions deserved.
I was reading this one before I left for RT and haven't picked it up to finish it - I really should! I quite liked it before. I loved how discombobulated Quinn is over his growing 'romantic' feelings for Amy and how he doesn't think Amy could possibly feel the same way - and then when she shows up at his place slightly looped and yells at him how she feels.
I haven't read Anything for You, but I am going to search out her back list when I get my ereader. But the one I did like slightly better I think, is She's Got it Bad.
I have this book and I'm saving it. I just read Take on Me by Mayberry this month and enjoyed the heck out of it, although Anything for You is still at the top of my list. Now I can't wait to read this one. :D I do have Amorous Liaisons waiting on my TBR pile and well... you know I'm gloming Mayberry too. :D
I do love those likable heroes and its tougher to find them in contemporaries. I did like Dr. Jake Dalton in Dancing in the Moonlight by Raeanne Thaynne.
Oh, I am such a cranky reader of series contemporaries. I read Anything for You; it was . . . fine.
(It's me. I know it's me.)
I envy your enthusiasm. :-)
I adore Sarah Mayberry's books. I've read all but two and I'm hoarding them for a rainy day.
She is one of the very few authors who writes sex scenes I actually read as opposed to skim. She has the enviable knack of incorporating them into the storyline without them seeming like a quick porn break and/or a tedious 'Lovers' Guide' documentary.
I was reluctant to try her SuperRomances because I knew they would be less explicit than her Blazes. I needn't have worried. I really enjoyed 'Her Best Friend'.
Post a Comment