
Such excitement. I've been promising this review forever and ever. And it's lo-o-o-o-ong.
Be warned, there be spoilers here. Since the book was first printed in 1983, I take the view that spoilers are absolutely allowed but if you think you'll ever read it, you may wish to stop reading .... now. Because I pretty much cover everything.
This novel is a Loveswept, which is a US category brand I'm not familiar with. As I said, it was originally printed in 1983 (though my copy is a 1991 reprint) and is one of a handful of novels written under the name of Laura London, a pen name for Tom and Sharon Curtis. Tom and Sharon's couple-portrait graces the inner cover of the book. With their warm woolly jumpers and wholesome hairdos, they look a pair of Canadian figure skaters from the 1980 Olympics. Which is nothing to the point, but a detail about the book I greatly enjoyed.
In a nutshell, LTL is the story of Jennifer Hamilton, shy librarian, and Philip Brooks, male-stripper-cum-environmental-scientist. The characters are so very particular in this book that it seems only fair to give them some individual attention in this review:
The heroine
Jennifer is in her early 20s. A recent college graduate, she has recently left home to strike out on her own as the a librarian in a small town in Wisconsin. She is described as having a Dorothy Hamill haircut and eyes the colour of burnt honey and as being variously gentle, shy, vulnerable, wary and hopeless with men. We discover later that she is 'exquisitely pretty' through an overheard conversation; the fact that that information is not offered up through the parts of the text that are written from her own POV is significant. I like to think that the authors deliberately described Jennifer in a way that would bring to mind the baby owls that Philip is looking after.
Dorothy Hamill around the time that LTL was first printed.
Otus asio (Eastern screech owl) There is something in Jennifer's life that has contributed to, though not perhaps wholly caused, her wariness and vulnerability. She is (brace yourselves) illegitimate.
This shameful circumstance caused Jennifer childhood grief and made her disinclined to trust others. Of course, I'm laughing at this from a 2010-perspective, but looking at it through the 1983 lens (see previous post on vintage books) this is not that ludicrous. If Jennifter was 23 in 1983 then she was born in 1960 and illegitimacy would have certainly been a reasonably big deal then.
The hero
Philip Brooks comes from old money. His family were of the Vanderbilt order of things but have lost shedloads of cash over the last few decades. All that is left of the old grandeur, for Philip, is the huge house he lives in. He's an environmental scientist with a passion for wildlife and the grounds of his house are a sanctuary to various wild creatures. Since the state have declined to take it on as a wildlife reserve, he is supporting its continued existence by earning lucrative sums as a stripper. At the start of the book, he takes his two newest hangers-on, two baby owls, back to the house to the look after them.
Philip is both ridiculously beautiful and unusually unmoved by beauty. Although the reader is given to understand that Jennifer is pretty, he doesn't see her in that way as such but more simply, as his mate. Nor does he doesn't recognise 'normal' sexual mores. As he sees it, if he and Jennifer want each other, they should simply be together.
The hero
Philip Brooks comes from old money. His family were of the Vanderbilt order of things but have lost shedloads of cash over the last few decades. All that is left of the old grandeur, for Philip, is the huge house he lives in. He's an environmental scientist with a passion for wildlife and the grounds of his house are a sanctuary to various wild creatures. Since the state have declined to take it on as a wildlife reserve, he is supporting its continued existence by earning lucrative sums as a stripper. At the start of the book, he takes his two newest hangers-on, two baby owls, back to the house to the look after them.
Philip is both ridiculously beautiful and unusually unmoved by beauty. Although the reader is given to understand that Jennifer is pretty, he doesn't see her in that way as such but more simply, as his mate. Nor does he doesn't recognise 'normal' sexual mores. As he sees it, if he and Jennifer want each other, they should simply be together.
The plot
The story starts with Jennifer being dragged to a male strip show by her new friends, all unsuspecting as to the nature of the show in question. When she realises, she is mortified. The show is described in great and quite excruciating detail. Before Philip comes on stage, Jennifer sees him at the sound console and they share a strangely intimate look. Later she sees him on stage. Philip's act involves him stripping then inviting women on-stage to kiss and touch him. Despite coming under considerable pressure to go along with this, Jennifer refuses, even when Philip himself tries to persuade her.
After the show, Philip comes across Jennifer again by accident. He recognises her and decides he wants her. Because the POV around this point of the novel is all Jennifer's, we don't get to understand how he comes to this view, only his later certainty about her. My only quibble with the book is that I'd have liked to understand how he came to this certainty and precisely when. (Was it during the strip show, or only later when he saw her an Abraham Lincoln costume while fundraising? Or only when she insulted him?)
Philip sets about a campaign. He waits for Jennifer outside the library and sends her friend home so he can drive her home; he takes her to the grounds of his house and introduces her to the wildlife he loves; he goes to her library and watches her pretend to be animals with the children. She's drawn to him, yet resistant.
There's a scene where Philip dissects Jennifer's reaction to his stripping and her objections to it.
"It's because I strip, isn't it?"....
..."Jenny, Jenny, why do you have to make this a problem?...... Alright then, let's explore your inconsistencies," he said. "If I posed nude as an artist's model, would that disturb you?"
Knowing that she was going for a baited hook, yet not able to resist the temptation, she said, "I'm not sure, probably not as much."
"I see. You like a high culture tag on your exposed skin. What if I was an artist who painted nudes?"
..."That would be different."
"High culture," he repeated dryly, "and you prefer to the exploiter to the exploited. Smart."
"Now just a - "
"What if I were a doctor and spent the day examining naked bodies?"
Exasperated, and yet enchanted by him, she said, "Doctors at least don't kiss their patients."
At the end of the scene, he tells her to come and find him when she's ready.
All of this action is conducted against a bitterly cold Wisconsin winter: needle-like snow; crystalline air; brittle ice-crust; icy water like frigid poison. This winter transcends mere setting and becomes almost a character when Jennifer decides to go and find Philip and give herself to him. Her car breaks down and she manages to lock herself out. She has to walk to his house in minus 60 weather and when she gets there, he's not in. By the time he arrives, she's collapsed outside the house and hypothermic. (I cannot tell you how much I love the sick-heroine story trope. Nor can I tell you why. I feel it is almost a shameful thing, like a love for processed cheese.)
Jennifer recovers quickly. She is introduced to Chaucer, Philip's grumpy and charming pet screech owl, and the baby owls. He tells her about his privileged childhood and his present life as a stripper. He takes her up to the attic and they dress in decades-old finery and dance together. He tells her he loves her. At length, she does what she went there to do and gives herself to Philip.
One of the charming things about the book is the occasional letters that pass between Jennifer and her mother. These disclose a deep, affectionate relationship between mother and daughter, so rare in romance. Yet cleverly, Jennifer's mother is part of the major conflict/ black moment in the book. She writes to tell Jennifer that she is coming to visit - she and some friends are going to the Cougar Club where Philip strips, a decision that was directly influenced by Jennifer's letter to her mother after she went to the Cougar Club at the start of the book and told her that the most beautiful man in the world was there.
Jennifer can't bear the thought of her mother seeing Philip stripping and heads off for the Cougar Club herself. She sees Philip dancing and kissing other women and is distraught. She goes to his dressing room in tears. His friend tries to persuade her to leave and discloses that Philip has been drinking in order to be able to dance. There's an excruciating scene when he finally comes to the dressing room. He's bleeding from his hip, and when he sees her register this, he says:
"Another paper cut. Brand new dollar bills are fierce."
It's an ordinary enough observation yet poignant, bringing vividly to mind the women that have come to see him, filling their purses with cash they will later push on him. Then he looks at her.
... the short tidy hair, her clean fingernails, the long, immaculate eyelashes, each separate and satiny.... fragile mouth, fragile eyes. Neat, bright fastidious you, he thought; soiled me.
Isn't that a lovely last sentence?
They argue - and here comes one of the very best declaration climaxes I think I've ever read.
She began to shake. "Philip, I love you. But it hurts too much."
..."Don't love me then," he said. "You want me, you desire me, then use me. If you've started to love me and it hurts too much, then stop loving me and use me instead. Let me worry about the love. Whatever you do, stay in my life!"
Of course this is not the end. Jennifer goes home and her mother is there. Their talk decides Jennifer not to give up. She goes looking for Philip in his forest. Without the stripping money, he can't save the forest or the wildlife, but he will have her, and she will help him. (And there's a pleasing little epilogue that lets them have their dreams after all).
Two Particularly Pleasing Things About This Book
Thing the First: Owls and cougars
As I said earlier, I like to think that Jennifer was deliberately described so as to call to mind the sort of baby owl that Philip is nursing, with her fragile eyes and Dorothy Hamill prettiness. As for Philip, it's no accident that he dances at the Cougar Club. In some ways, he is hunter and she is prey.
For a moment, she was painfully open, her unguarded sensitivity carrying the simplicity of a line drawing - Tweetybird in a tough predicament..... He had a sudden unsettling vision of himself as a predator - the puma holding a small struggling creature under one paw.
Hunter/ prey; experienced/ innocent; soiled/ pure. And as is often the way in romance, it's the big-eyed baby owl, who ends up standing on top of the puma, blinking innocently down at its exposed belly.
Fanciful? Moi?
Thing the Second: Not a word wasted
Sometimes, novels contain sentences, paragraphs, pages even, of wasted words. This novel didn't feel like it contained a word that didn't serve some purpose. For example, there is a repeated motif of temperature. The brutal winter is a strong element of the setting and a crucial plot element, but it tells us about the characters too. It's not an accident that Jennifer almost dies of cold and is saved by Philip; nor that at the end of black moment (the scene in the Cougar Club) Philip puts his muffler round Jennifer's neck as she leaves and says to her these two words:
Keep warm.


17 comments:
My stream of consciousness response to the review:
Processed cheese? I like mild cheddar. Does that count as processed?
"Cougar Club"? And her mother goes there? Did older women who go after younger men get called "cougars" in 1983, or did that term come along later? Think it must be quite a recent term.
He gets paper cuts? What's the health and safety position on this? And on the kissing? Hmm. Think he should give up the stripping.
"Without the stripping money, he can't save the forest or the wildlife" - well, in that case I think he shouldn't give up stripping.
Baby owls may be fluffy and have big eyes, but they're baby predators.
I read this one last year and I was struck by two things: 1) I was surprised it "held up" as well as it did and 2) Dear Lord, who knew you could cram that much purple prose into 180 pages?
Like you, I ultimately didn't "get" why Philip fell in love with Jenny. What was it about her that flipped his switch? I mean, other than the fact that she wasn't throwing her pantie at him ;-) Although in the immortal words of KristieJ (who commented on my review), "Duh Wendy, isn't it obvious? He's attracted to her because she's a LIBRARIAN!" LOL
In the end, I decided that had I read this book as a teenager I would have fallen head of heels in love with it. What with all those angsty teenage emo hormones running through my blood stream at the time. But as an adult? I saw it's charms, but ultimately it was just an interesting look back at a slice of category romance history. A worthwhile read, but one I had no desire to hang on to and "reread" someday.
I never thought of Philip claiming Jenny as his mate. But now that I think of it, their courtship are much like the owls he studies.
This is my all time favorite category read. Love it to pieces.
This sounds like an interesting read.
Laura - I had exactly the same train of thought about the cougar thing. But I don't think we should all strip to save the world. There has to be another way!
Wendy - I thought it was much more than a charming read that had worn reasonably well. Yes, I had that quibble about why Philip was drawn to Jennifer, but this was a book that satisfied me in so many ways that it really didn't matter. The language was very pleasing; it was a well-crafted story with neat metaphors and motifs; it had interesting things to say about various things, such as love and ownership. Loved it.
KB - me too.
Vic - it is.
"But I don't think we should all strip to save the world. There has to be another way!"
Maybe one of those artistically posed semi-naked calendars? ;-)
Okay, I need this book.
Also, I had the Dorothy Hamill haircut when I was in grade school. :(
I have been eating my dinner in front of the computer reading your summary here. It's very riveting and entertaining!
So, he quits stripping, though? In the end? How will she help him keep the land?
I love that he's drinking in order to keep stripping, and it's all for the animals. OMG, I would marry this guy in a minute.
> ..."Don't love me then," he said. "You want me, you desire me, then use me. If you've started to love me and it hurts too much, then stop loving me and use me instead. Let me worry about the love. Whatever you do, stay in my life!" >
Oof. Intense and dysfunctional, like all the best romances.
Lovely review. I've got one of theirs (rock star/ girl next door, I think) somewhere on my tbr.
Laura - e-calendars? The trees we'd cut down would surely undo our good work?
Jen B - How the heck R u? I had a much worse haircut than that...
CJ - me too. Who wouldn't fall for such a selfless hedonist?
Meriam - and the how the heck R U? Interesting that you mention a girl next door and a rock star. Another S&T Curtis popped through my letterbox earlier in the week and it's about a jaded director of horror films and a - get this - Amish widow. So I'm thinking they kinda like the rake/pure woman thing...
"and a - get this - Amish widow. So I'm thinking they kinda like the rake/pure woman thing..."
You can be absolutely sure of it if she's a virgin Amish widow.
I've read that one - it is superb!
I'm going to go ahead and say it: you'll love it. It's going to be your next keeper.
... Sunshine and Shadow, right? Before I go off on a completely random tangent.
Laura - time will tell
Meriam - one and the same. And I've started it, and yes, I am loving it.
Guess what came in the mail today? This book! So I have not read your review, although I caught a reference to cheese which puzzled me. Is the hero the owner of a dairy farm?
Will let you know how I like it, and look forward to reading your review then.
PS. Hi Meriam!
Forgive me . . .erm, romance readers? For I have sinned, I loathe Tom and Sharon Curtis' heroines. Granted I've only read The Windflower and The Bad Baron's Daughters but lord preserve me or pervese me because I just don't get 'em! I wonder why these rakes keep falling in love with girls I tend to think of having very mild forms of downs syndrome.
And yet, I really liked both of those books even though I hated the heroines. I've wanted to read The Lightning that Lingers for a long time but . . . I just don't know if I can take the heroine.
Angela - I've now read Sunshine and Shadows too (which I'll probably post on) and it seems they have a very clear idea of what a romance hero and heroine should be. Innocence and experience in a nutshell. I can imagine some might find the types tiresome. I personally felt that they did a pretty good job with the heroine in LTL and actually a pretty magnificent job in SAS. Both are contemps. I'm curious (and probably soon to find out) if they can pull it off in an historical.
I love your "mild form of downs syndrome" comment!
Post a Comment