I'm afraid it was a similar reaction, though for slightly different reasons.
On the plus side, great world building. Solid writing. Excellent story-telling.
On the negative side, things that disturbed me** and a lack of the type of conflict I like between my hero and heroine. (**On which more later).
In all three Psy/changeling books, whilst the full realisation of the depth of their emotions only comes close to the end, the hero and heroine basically acknowledge their attraction/ desire/ love from a relatively early stage. The agents that keep them apart are very much external agents. In books one and two, the core issue between the hero and heroine is the heroine's inability to live without the Psynet.
I've realised in considering my reaction to Singh's books that this isn't really my thing. I like the conflict between my protaganists to be highly personal and solidly rooted in character. I like their characters to develop through the romance. Character driven stories are more my thing than action-based stories. Singh's characters are too static for me. The heroes are Who They Are and they do not change. They simply fight the external obstacles thrown in their way, and they do so with absolute success.
I was intrigued by book 3 which promised a psy hero, a changeling heroine and possibly something a bit different. And I suppose it was a bit different. Instead of pawing Brenna like the changeling heroes, Judd was remote and icy. And Brenna was hotter and feistier - in some ways - than the psy heroines. But:-
(1) Judd has more in common with the changeling heroes than not. Like them, he is domineering/ dominant, possessive and sexually in control.
(2) I was mystified by the endless references to Judd's un-psy-like strength and speed. It was as though the hero always has to be the strongest, swiftest most alpha man ever. If we were told once that he could kill with a single mind-blow, we were told a hundred times and latterly I began to giggle whenever it came up. It just began to seem like this absurd delusion that Judd had.
(3) But the thing that bothered me more than anything else, was the moral focus of the novel; in particular the eye-for-an-eye philosophy and glorification of vigilante justice. It's absolutely at odds with my personal philsophy (I'll declare an interest - I'm a member of Amnesty) and it diminished the characters in my eyes. The constant references to the gory justice that was meted out to Brenna's abductor and the internal musings of Judd about how he wanted to 'bathe in the blood' of another would-be-murderer made me very uncomfortable. So much so that my concerns about the controlling nature of Singh's heroes paled into insignificance.
So that's it for me with the psy/changeling series I fear.
Good writer; excellent storyteller.
Not for me.


5 comments:
Even though I love every single book by Singh, this one is my least favorite because I think Judd is just too cold for my tastes even though it cracks me up every time he gets horney, he breaks the furnature.
Oh, very interesting, Though I found the plot entertaining, I have to agree with your thoughts here. I think it is really brilliant that you point out how Judd is sort of "made" into a psy male, where you might expect the tables to be more turned and the female to be the sexual dominant. And we have Brenna as damaged, so in that way the previous two novels are sort of recreated vis a vis m/f roles. So interesting.
It's funny, because I like these novels and read them, but sort of in the way I used to like the TV show Law & Order (an American police procedural) - reliable, but not a show I was passionate about. A good show when nothing else was on. (Back when I had time to watch TV like that) And both Law and Order and Singh rely on external conflict, as you say.
It's not for everyone, but I do love this series and as both you and CJ has pointed out, it's based more on external conflict (the kind I usually prefer).
Dorian and Ashaya's more internal conflict, I guess, but overall, the males are all dominate, etc. etc. :) But, as you've pointed out, it's not your think. ^_~
I do agree that after a while...well, to this day, everytime I see or hear the word "Arrow" I cannot help but giggle. Teehee.
Like you, I read this novel because I hoped it would change the dynamic between the hero and the heroine (the first two books didn't really work for me in terms of romantic conflict). There is a difference in Brenna's and Judd's story but not as much as I hoped for and it's because of the reasons you pointed out so eloquently. Thanks.
I have to admit that I never made it past book 1 in this series. I can't even put my finger on it, but I never emotionally connected to the characters or the world Singh created. It just left me cold.
(the vigilante justice thing would probably also push my buttons, so maybe it's just as well I won't be reading this one).
on another note, it's nice to be back in the blogosphere. Hi! :)
Post a Comment